And what exactly is the conservative answer to that third point? Why does the government have a righ

On the infamous 4/20, the day for pot heads to gather together for a moment of reflection and smoking or just smoking, Evangelista threw a medical marijuana party to generate revenue for renovations to make Hotel Normandie into a pot-friendly hotel .
Nadia Smalley, a write-in-candidate for governor, loved the idea of a pot-tel and knew friends that would be stopping travel trailer dealers in concord by Hotel Normandie since it s such a nice social networking tool . Like Facebook, but smokier.
Inevitability travel trailer dealers in concord in this case is rather weak; when it’s legalized, it will be legalized, but that doesn’t necessarily make it inevitable. If it happens, we can then set those effective and efficient controls.
Among conservatives, this is likely the only argument that will have merit. Government should not be dictating what we can eat (salt), drink (alcohol), or smoke (incense?). But that doesn t mean being high even while at Koreatown s Reefer-Resort, LA s first pot-friendly hotel for some social networking gives you a defense, legally or otherwise, for your actions or inactions while under the influence, Gillespie points out.
Hotel fires worker for wearing US flag pin? Connecticut Hotel Woman Raped Was Careless (Open Talk) Indiana Democrat Fleebagger Compares Himself to Our Soldiers Mika Brzezinski Mugged China Mexico Flu Quarantine Feud John Edwards Love Child Scandal (Baby Photos)
First of all, it s unfair to act as if the first point is just about giving the government more money. The law enforcement savings are just as significant as any tax revenue, and any good conservative should be on-board with reducing unnecessary government spending. Besides, even a heavily taxed above-ground economy travel trailer dealers in concord is preferable to an underground economy to any free-market thinker.
And what exactly travel trailer dealers in concord is the conservative answer to that third point? Why does the government have a right to tell us not to smoke pot, but it can t tell us not to eat salt? The latter has led to the deaths of untold numbers of people, while there has not been a single travel trailer dealers in concord death credibly travel trailer dealers in concord attributed to cannabis travel trailer dealers in concord in the 5,000+ years of documented recreational and medicinal cannabis use. Five thousand. Four zeroes. Aspirin kills hundreds of people every year.
The reduction in law-enforcement cost is a good argument, but that’s more of a side effect from the third argument rather than the first. After all, additional taxes and regulation will bring its own government costs.
As to the second point about conservatives, travel trailer dealers in concord that s exactly right. Conservatives can get on board with that argument, out of any of the others. That s why I said: Among conservatives, this is likely the only argument that will have merit.
I m not a consumer of pot, but its ban is totally irrational and expensive, and supports a violent criminal economy. Legalize it, keep it out of the hands of minors as best we can, tax it heavily, and lets get on with our society, okay?
So why is marijuana legalization so demonized in mainstream conservative circles then? Last I knew it wasn t part of the Republican platform (unless you count Ron Paul). Conservatives should get on board with that point, but they rarely do.
Come on now the public resources required to collect taxes and enforce zoning are nothing compared to those required to investigate, arrest, imprison, and try marijuana defendants. We arrest about 800,000 people per year in this country for minor marijuana possession alone this doesn t count cultivation or sale arrests. That money adds up very quickly.
Besides, even if it didn t save money, there is something to be said for freeing up police to work on real, actual crime. How about instead of spitting into the Drug War wind, we try to get rape solve rates above like 25%? Or murder solve rates above 50%? Those seem like worthwhile uses of public resources to me.
because the leading medical researchers have found that it causes schizophrenia that you do not want to admit that is obvious, however that does not change the fact that it is a catastrophic drug that destroys some users lives.
That s fine, nobody s asking you to like cannabis. But surely you don t advocate a return to alcohol prohibition, or instituting a criminal prohibition of tobacco, do you? That s because these substances, while they have their risks (much more severe ones than cannabis in fact), are better dealt with above ground than underground. The same is true for marijuana.
Whether you personally love cannabis or hate it, the fact is that its criminal prohibition is unworkable and harms all citizens in some way. Legalization isn t about giving potheads what they want, it s about choosing the most effective way to deal with reality.
Wrong, and wrong. It s easy to traffic, believe me. Seizures of hundreds of kilograms don t even have an effect travel trailer dealers in concord on major markets because there is so much of the stuff around. And marijuana is becoming more potent, more widely available, and more affordable.
No; real drug dealers do not touch drugs. People who get busted with the stuff usually don t even know who the boss-man is, so they can t give up anybody. The stats make it painfully obvious that the vast majority of marijuana arrests are for minor possession and nothing more some 800,000 people per year.
Unless you think alcohol prohibition was an effective and worthwhile policy, you re being extremely hypocritical. Different substance, same set of facts (except that cannabis is far, far safer than alcohol).
it is one of the cops chief tools in the war on drugs. that is exactly why roughly half of all drug possession arrests are for pot. it is hard to hide and carries huge penalties and gets lots of leverage on those who sell drugs
Our laws should be in line with biblical laws. don t steal, don t murder, travel trailer dealers in concord don t covet. That makes sense and allows for a society to function more smoothly with this basic law and order. But to criminalize people for what they ingest is really going beyond God s law and it quickly becomes a political tool. Cities could still maintain basic law and order by regulating its sale and taxing it, making it a public nuisance to do in public, regulate you be sober when your drive, all reasonable, without criminalizing you. The war on drugs has criminalized so many of our fellow citizens its not funny. Near half of all people sitting in prison today are there on a nonviolent drug related offense. While there is no perfect solution, and even legal drugs can be harmful depending on the user, I still cannot see the sense in criminalizing even more of our population. They will not be able to get good, or any jobs, will not be able to support their families and children properly, and will be pushed into the criminal side of life as far as making a living or whom they associate with. Even our current dui laws are a defacto prohibition against alcohol, and one or two beers on an empty stomach in a restaurant or bar can put you over the limit. I don t think even the prohibitionists can claim there is intent to do break the law there, but you will be. Portugauls policy of decriminalization has apparently worked well, and they still send peole to diversion programs without criminalizing them. There has been no net increase of use there. nor the kind of drug war kind of violence seen here. I really am amazed that Americans think the only solution is to criminalize everyone over social policy. They estimate travel trailer dealers in concord that today, men born in America have a near 50% chance of being arrested in their lifetimes for something criminal. This will in effect put half our potential workforce into the unhireable range as now more and more places want to even know if someone has been arrested on the application.