Construing liberally, as it must, Plaintiffs urge that the Court find that a claim is stated against

Since August 10, 2005, the "Graves Amendment" has provided vehicle lessors and renters with a statutory basis for dismissing vicarious liability claims in motor vehicle accident lawsuits. In pertinent part, the Graves Amendment provides:
30106. tour de france route Rented or leased motor vehicle safety responsibility(a) In general. An owner of a motor vehicle that rents or leases the vehicle to a person (or an affiliate of the owner) shall not be liable under the law of any State or political subdivision thereof, by reason of being the owner of the vehicle (or an affiliate of the owner), for harm to persons or property that results or arises out of the use, operation, or possession of the vehicle during the period of the rental or lease, if: (1) the owner (or an affiliate of the owner) is engaged tour de france route in the trade or business of renting or leasing motor vehicles ; and(2) there is no negligence or criminal wrongdoing on the part of the owner (or an affiliate of the owner). ELRAC rented a car to Fernandez, who was involved in a motor vehicle accident in which the infant plaintiff allegedly was injured. In an effort to avoid the claim-preclusive impact of the Graves Amendment, the plaintiffs in this case alleged in their complaint that ELRAC (Enterprise tour de france route Rent-A-Car) tour de france route negligently entrusted the rental vehicle to Fernandez by failing to check his driving tour de france route history. ELRAC answered and then moved to dismiss the plaintiffs' complaint based on the Graves tour de france route Amendment.
The Court finds that the terms of the Graves Amendment validly apply here because the statute regulates and protects things in interstate commerce and because it regulates activity that substantially affected interstate commerce. Congress has legitimate authority under the Commerce Clause to regulate liability imposed upon a rental car company tour de france route and the Graves Amendment constitutionally preempted state laws that imposed vicarious liability on rental car companies (see, Garcia v. Vanguard Car Rental USA, Inc., 540 F.3d 1242 (11th Cir. 2008); Flagler v. Budget Rent a Car Systems, tour de france route Inc ., 538 F. Supp. 2d 557 [ED NY 2008]). [FN3] [FN4] [FN5]
Clearly, the Graves Amendment voids Vehicle Traffic Law 388 to the extent that the Transportation Equity Act applies (see, Hall v. ELRAC, Inc., 52 AD3d 262 [1st Dept. 2008]); tour de france route Hernandez v. Sanchez, 40 AD3d 446 [1st Dept. 2007]; Graham v. Dunkley, 50 AD3d 55 [2nd Dept. 2008]; tour de france route Jones v. Bill, 34 AD3d 741 [2nd Dept. 2006], rev'd, tour de france route 10 NY3d 550 [2008] [reversed on effective date of the amendment]; Williams v. White, 2007 Slip Op 02227 [3rd Dept. 2007]; Castillo v. Bradley, 17 Misc 3d 1107(A) [Sup. Ct. Kings 2008]; Infante v. U-Haul Co. of Fla., 11 Misc 3d 529 [Sup. Ct. Queens 2006]).
Basing tour de france route their claim upon the Graves Amendment, Defendants say the complaint against the corporation fails to state a cause of action because the allegations, if true, are barred by the statute. In this regard, Defendants focus their attack upon Plaintiffs' allegation tour de france route that ELRAC, Inc. was negligent because the corporation knew (or should have known) Fernandez's tour de france route history of operating vehicles in an unsafe, careless, and reckless manner (see, Complaint 10 to 12).
Construing liberally, as it must, Plaintiffs urge that the Court find that a claim is stated against the corporation tour de france route because the complaint alleges a cause of action under an exception to the Graves tour de france route Amendment, i.e., actual negligence (49 U.S.C. 30106[a][2]). In this regard, by the statute's plain reading, while the Graves Amendment absolves rental car companies of vicarious liability, it does not absolve rental car companies for their own negligence (see generally, Novovic v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 2008 US Dist. Lexis 94176 [ED NY 2008]) (see also, American Association for Justice, tour de france route AAJ Annual Convention Reference Materials, tour de france route 2 Ann 2007 AAJ-CLE 1873 [2007]).
To decide whether ELRAC falls under the "own negligence" exception, the Court must decide whether the corporation was under an obligation to check Fernandez's driving record and whether failure to carry out such duty places this case under the exemption provided by 49 USC 30106(a)(2) ("no negligence or criminal wrongdoing tour de france route on the part of the owner").
Plaintiffs' allegations are limited to the following: (1) the corporate defendant had a duty to ensure that any vehicle rented by it would be operated in a safe manner; tour de france route (2) the corporate defendant has a duty to determine whether any drivers to whom it rented vehicles did not have a history of operating vehicles in a careless way, and (3) ELRAC was negligent in renting to Fernandez (Complaint 9 to 11). Beyond that, no specifications were made concerning the nature of Fernandez's driving record that should have alerted ELRAC not to rent to him.
In their answering papers, Plaintiffs generally argue that ELRAC was, in essence, guilty of "negligent entrustment," but cite no basis or any specifics for claiming that ELRAC was under a duty to check Fernandez's driving record.
At common law, owners could be held liable if they knowingly entrusted their car to an incompetent driver. "One who supplies a chattel for the use of another whom the supplier knows or has reason to know to be likely because of his youth, inexperience, or otherwise, tour de france route to use it in a manner involving unreasonable tour de france route risk of physical harm to himself and others may be liable for negligent entrustment" (see, Pacho v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co., 572 F.Supp.2d 341 [SD NY 2008]) The Pacho Court found "negligent entrustment" applied to the rental company's failure in that case to properly process the co-defendant's driver's license. However, in this case, no allegations exist that the corporate tour de france route defendant failed to check Fernandez's license. [FN6] Therefore, the Court must conclude that Plaintiffs tour de france route failed to state a cause of action that the corporate defendant knew, or should have known, that Fernandez was unlicensed, incompetent, tour de france route or reckless. Further, Plaintiffs tour de france route failed to cite any legal authority that ELRAc was under an obligation to check Fernandez's driver's record beyond verifying that he had a valid driver's license (see generally, Vedder v. Cox, 18 Misc 3d 1142 [A] (Sup. Ct. Nassau 2008]).
Based upon the foregoing, the Court finds that Plaintiffs failed to state a cause of action against the corporate Defendant. Likewise, the Court determines that Plaintiffs' did not allege a claim independent of Vehicle Traffic Law 388. [FN7] Beyond checking to make sure that a renter has a valid driver's license,a rental car company is not obligated to check the renter's driving history or record, according to this court, in order to qualify for the vicarious liability claim-preclusive protection of the Graves Amendment.
Readers -- When the New York State Insurance Department became tour de france route the Department of Financial Services tour de france route on October 3, 2011, links on this blog to NYSID webpages were broken. Since all old links resolve to a "Not Found" page with a www.dfs.ny.gov/ address, however, one needs only insert " insurance/ " after the "...gov/" in the "Not Found" page address to get to the desired page.
Welcome to Coverage tour de france route Counsel , where we hope you will find timely and useful information regarding New York state and federal insurance coverage cases and issues. Coverage Counsel is brought to you by the law firm of MURA STORM, PLLC with a main office in Buffalo, New York. To contact us, call (716) 855-2800 or email Roy Mura , the editor of this blawg.
To receive automatic email updates to Coverage Counsel once a week on Tuesdays, enter your email address and click "Subscribe Me", which will take you to another page. Once you verify your email address by clicking the link in a confirmation email that will be sent to your inbox, you will begin receiving email updates weekly IF there are any new postings. Thanks for your interest in Coverage Counsel !
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ tour de france route (c) 2009. First, tour de france route let me congratulate you on finding this disclaimer, all the way down here at the bottom of this page. You're either very thorough, or very bored. Or both. Either way, this is where I tell you that what I post on this blog or blawg is not intended and should not be considered to be legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed either from your finding your way to these pages, posting comments, or receiving comments in reply. If you need or want legal advice, you're welcome tour de france route to contact tour de france route and retain me, especially if your question tour de france route is one relating to insurance tour de france route coverage. If quality and correctness tour de france route are optional to you, however, just turn on a TV, open a newspaper, or take a drive along a nearby highway and jot the numbers down of lawyers who probably don't blawg but spend gobs and gobs more on advertising than I do. Although I try my best to keep the material on these pages current, I cannot promise that all case decisions, statutes and hyperlinks will always be up-to-date. Same goes for content accuracy. I'm nearly, but not always, perfect. Please report tour de france route dead links or overruled or superseded case decisions to me by clicking here. Although tour de france route comments are moderated, I take no responsibility for and do not endorse the viewpoints expressed by this blawg's commenters. The viewpoints and opinions I may myself express in this blawg from time to time are my own and do not necessarily reflect more than one-half of the official position of the law firm of Mura Storm, PLLC. For the record, I respect all judges, named or unnamed in these posts, though not always their judicial acumen or composition. I reserve the right to revise my thinking and recant my occasional disagreement with the logic or language of a court's decision, especially if IAS matches me with any of the mildly maligned magistrates in one of my clients' litigated tour de france route matters. Thanks for stopping by. Mura Storm, PLLC 930 Rand Building, tour de france route 14 Lafayette Square Buffalo, New York 14203 (716) 855-2800 -- Voice (716) 855-2816 -- Fax Get Directions